4.7 Article

Substituent-specific antibody against glucuronoxylan reveals close association of glucuronic acid and acetyl substituents and distinct labeling patterns in tree species

Journal

PLANTA
Volume 236, Issue 2, Pages 739-751

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-012-1653-7

Keywords

4-O-methylglucuronic acid; Antibody specificity; Immunolocalization; NMR; Xylan acetylation; Xylooligosaccharides

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [124281]
  2. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), France, through EU ERA-Net programme
  3. COST action [928]
  4. Nordforsk
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [124281, 124281] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunolabeling can be used to locate plant cell wall carbohydrates or other components to specific cell types or to specific regions of the wall. Some antibodies against xylans exist; however, many partly react with the xylan backbone and thus provide limited information on the type of substituents present in various xylans. We have produced a monoclonal antibody which specifically recognizes glucopyranosyl uronic acid (GlcA), or its 4-O-methyl ether (meGlcA), substituents in xylan and has no cross-reactivity with linear or arabinofuranosyl-substituted xylans. The UX1 antibody binds most strongly to (me)GlcA substitutions at the non-reducing ends of xylan chains, but has a low cross-reactivity with internal substitutions as well, at least on oligosaccharides. The antibody labeled plant cell walls from both mono- and dicotyledons, but in most tissues an alkaline pretreatment was needed for antibody binding. The treatment removed acetyl groups from xylan, indicating that the vicinity of glucuronic acid substituents is also acetylated. The novel labeling patterns observed in the xylem of tree species suggested that differences within the cell wall exist both in acetylation degree and in glucuronic acid content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available