4.7 Article

Manganese-induced oxidative stress in two ontogenetic stages of chamomile and amelioration by nitric oxide

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.015

Keywords

Fluorescence microscopy; Heavy metals; Mineral nutrients; Ontogenesis; Reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. OP Education for Competitiveness (European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic) Postdocs in Biological Sciences at MENDELU [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impact of manganese (Mn2+) excess (100, 500 and 1000 mu M over 7 days) on two ontogenetic stages (7-week-old plants and 7-day-old seedlings) of Matricaria chamomilla was compared. Mn excess depressed growth of seedlings (but not germination) and stimulated oxidative stress (ROS and lipid peroxidation) in both plants and seedlings. Growth inhibition could be evoked by higher Mn uptake and higher translocation factor in seedlings than in plants. Total thiols staining revealed elevation in almost all treatments. In 7-week-old plants, activity of peroxidases increased slightly and rather decreased under high Mn doses. Superoxide rather than hydrogen peroxide contributed to visualized ROS presence. Fluorescence of nitric oxide (NO) showed stimulation in plants but decrease in seedlings. Impact of exogenous nitric oxide donor (sodium nitroprusside/SNP) was therefore tested and results showed amelioration of 1000 mu M Mn-induced oxidative stress in seedlings (decrease in H2O2 and increase in NO content while antioxidative enzyme activities were variably affected) concomitantly with depleted Mn accumulation. It is concluded that NO participates in tolerance to Mn excess but negative effects of the highest SNP dose were also observed. Extensive fluorescence microscopy is also explanatively discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available