4.7 Review

Constraints to obtaining consistent annual yields in perennials. II: Environment and fruit load affect induction of flowering

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages 168-176

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.02.006

Keywords

Flowering; Alternate bearing; FT; Fruit tree; Gibberellin; Inductive cold temperatures

Funding

  1. Israeli Science Foundation-the Charles H. Revson Foundation [1464/07]
  2. Chief Scientist Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Israel [837-0086-10, 837-0132-11]
  3. German-Israeli Project Cooperation (DIP project) [H 3.1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many commercial fruit crop species, high fruit load inhibits vegetative growth and floral induction. As a result, trees that had a high fruit load will bear few flowers and fruit the following year, along with abundant vegetative growth. We previously discussed how high fruit load interferes with concurrent shoot growth. Here we focus on how high fruit load impacts the process of flowering. Ascertaining the precise time at which specific buds begin the floral transition in each species is challenging. The use of indirect approaches to determine time of floral induction or evocation may lead to questionable conclusions. Annual and perennial plants appear to use conserved proteins for flowering induction and initiation. The accumulation or reduction of transcripts encoding proteins similar to Arabidopsis (annual) FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1), respectively, correlates well with flower induction in several diverse species. The recent use of such markers provides a means to formulate an accurate timeframe for floral induction in different species and holds promise in providing new insight into this important developmental event. A role for hormones in modulating the inhibitory effect of fruit load on floral induction is also discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available