4.7 Article

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cell suspension cultures: Establishment, characterization, and application

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 181, Issue 6, Pages 712-715

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.12.010

Keywords

Switchgrass; Cell suspension cultures; Scanning electron microscopy; Protoplasts; Cell wall

Funding

  1. BioEnergy Science Center (BESC)
  2. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a warm-season perennial grass that has received considerable attention as a potential dedicated biofuel and bioproduct feedstock. Genetic improvement of switchgrass is needed for better cellulosic ethanol production, especially to improve cellulose-to-lignin ratios. Cell suspension cultures offer an in vitro system for mutant selection, mass propagation, gene transfer, and cell biology. Toward this end, switchgrass cell suspension cultures were initiated from embryogenic callus obtained from genotype Alamo 2. They have been established and characterized with different cell type morphologies: sandy, fine milky, and ultrafine cultures. Characterization includes histological analysis using scanning electron microscopy, and utility using protoplast isolation. A high protoplast isolation rate of up to 10(6) protoplasts/1.0g of cells was achieved for the fine milky culture, whereas only a few protoplasts were isolated for the sandy and ultrafine cultures. These results indicate that switchgrass cell suspension type sizably impacts the efficiency of protoplast isolation, suggesting its significance in other applications. The establishment of different switchgrass suspension culture cell types provides the opportunity to gain insights into the versatility of the system that would further augment switchgrass biology research. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available