4.7 Article

Genome-wide survey and expression profiling of heat shock proteins and heat shock factors revealed overlapped and stress specific response under abiotic stresses in rice

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 176, Issue 4, Pages 583-590

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.016

Keywords

Oryza sativa; Microarray; Heat shock; Expression profile; Abiotic stress

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006AA10A102]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-N-024]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30821004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat shock proteins (Hsps) are molecular chaperons, which function in protein folding and assembly, protein intracellular localization and secretion, and degradation of misfolded and truncated proteins. Heat shock factors (Hsfs) are the transcriptional activators of Hsps. It has been reported that Hsps and Hsfs are widely involved in response to various abiotic stresses such as heat, drought, salinity and cold. To elucidate the function and regulation of rice Hsp, and Hsf genes, we examined a global expression profiling with heat stressed rice seedling, and then compared our results with the previous rice data undercold, drought and salt stresses. The comparison revealed that, while most Hsfs and Hsps had highly similar and overlapped response and regulation patterns under different stresses, some of those genes showed significantly specific response to distinct stress. We also found that heat-responsive gene profiling differed largely from those under cold/drought/salt stresses, and that drought treatment was more effective to up-regulate Hsf expression in rice than in Arabidopsis. Overall, our data suggests that Hsps and Hsfs might be important elements in cross-talk of different stress signal transduction networks. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available