4.3 Article

Nitrogen Uptake by the Rice Plant and Changes in the Soil Chemical Properties in the Paddy Rice Field during Yearly Application of Anaerobically-Digested Manure for Seven Years

Journal

PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 237-244

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1626/pps.17.237

Keywords

Digested manure; Long-term experiment; Method of fertilizer application; Nitrogen; Paddy rice; Soil fertility

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [17380161]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17380161] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the changes in the chemical properties of the plow soil during a 7-year period with yearly application of anaerobically-digested manure (ADM), and the effect of the different ADM application methods on nitrogen (N) uptake by rice plants and the apparent N balance (input N minus output N). Among the treatments significant differences were observed in the pH, total N, and available N in the plow soil. The cumulative N uptake by rice plants in the ADM split application plots was significantly higher than that in single application plots. Consequently, the apparent N balance (input N minus output N) in the single ADM application plots was more positive. This result suggests that split application of ADM is more favorable for N uptake by rice plants. Although the apparent N balance was negative in the plots without N fertilizer, with chemical N and with low ADM, there was no observable decline in the total N and available N in the plow soil. This result implies that input and output of N in these plots were well balanced by additional N supply other than fertilization. On the other hand, the apparent N balance during the 7-year study under standard and heavy application of ADM was positive, indicating the preservation of soil fertility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available