4.7 Article

Salicylic acid and gentisic acid induce RNA silencing-related genes and plant resistance to RNA pathogens

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 35-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.01.016

Keywords

Resistance; Salicylic acid; Gentisic acid; Gene silencing; ToMV; CEVd; Tomato

Categories

Funding

  1. Direccion General de Programas y Transferencia de Conocimiento [BFU2009-11958]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  3. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (UPV) [PAID-06-08-3295, SP20120576]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) [ACIF/2010/231]
  5. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (Spain) [JAE-Doc_08_00402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have observed that treatments with salicylic acid (SA) or gentisic acid (GA) induced resistance to RNA pathogens such as ToMV and CEVd in tomato and Gynura auriantiaca, respectively. Accumulation of SA and GA has been found to occur in plants infected by these pathogens, thus pointing out a possible defence role of both molecules. To study the molecular basis of the observed induced resistance to RNA pathogens the induction of silencing-related genes by SA and GA was considered. For that purpose, we searched for tomato genes which were orthologous to those described in Arabidopsis thaliana, such as AtDCL1, AtDCL2, AtDCL4, AtRDR1, AtRDR2 and AtRDR6, and we tracked their induction in tomato along virus and viroid infections. We observed that CEVd significantly induced all these genes in tomato, with the exception of ToRDR6, being the induction of ToDCL4 the most outstanding. Regarding the ToMV asymptomatic infection, with the exception of ToRDR2, we observed a significant induction of all the indicated silencing-related genes, being ToDCL2 the most induced gene. Subsequently, we analyzed their transcriptional activation by SA and at the time when ToMV was inoculated on plants. ToDCL2, ToRDR1 and ToRDR2 were significantly induced by both SA and GA, whereas ToDCL1 was only induced by SA. Such an induction resulted more effective by SA treatment, which is in agreement with the stronger SA-induced resistance observed. Our results suggest that the observed delay in the RNA pathogen accumulation could be due to the pre-induction of RNA silencing-related genes by SA or GA. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available