4.7 Article

Selection and validation of reference genes for transcript normalization in gene expression studies in Catharanthus roseus

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages 20-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.07.004

Keywords

BestKeeper; Catharanthus roseus; geNorm; NormFinder; qPCR; Reference gene; Transcript normalization

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Program FP7 [222716-SMARTCELL]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR), a sensitive and commonly used technique for gene expression analysis, requires stably expressed reference genes for normalization of gene expression. Up to now, only one reference gene for qPCR analysis, corresponding to 40S Ribosomal protein S9 (RPS9), was available for the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus, the only source of the commercial anticancer drugs vinblastine and vincristine. Here, we screened for additional reference genes for this plant species by mining C roseus RNA-Seq data for orthologs of 22 genes known to be stably expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana and qualified as superior reference genes for this model plant species. Based on this, eight candidate C roseus reference genes were identified and, together with RPS9, evaluated by performing qPCR on a series of different C roseus explants and tissue cultures. NormFinder, geNorm and BestKeeper analyses of the resulting qPCR data revealed that the orthologs of At2g28390 (SAND family protein, SAND), At2g32170 (N2227-like family protein, N2227) and At4g26410 (Expressed protein, EXP) had the highest expression stability across the different C roseus samples and are superior as reference genes as compared to the traditionally used RPS9. Analysis of publicly available C roseus RNA-Seq data confirmed the expression stability of SAND and N2227, underscoring their value as reference genes for C roseus qPCR analysis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available