4.8 Article

Stem Transcriptome Reveals Mechanisms to Reduce the Energetic Cost of Shade-Avoidance Responses in Tomato

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 2, Pages 1110-1119

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.201921

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Buenos Aires [G044, 01/W437]
  2. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Technology [CRP/ARG07-02]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 1819]
  4. Texas AgriLife Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the most conspicuous response to low red/far-red ratios (R:FR) of shade light perceived by phytochrome is the promotion of stem growth, additional, less obvious effects may be discovered by studying changes in the stem transcriptome. Here, we report rapid and reversible stem transcriptome responses to R: FR in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). As expected, low R: FR promoted the expression of growth-related genes, including those involved in the metabolism of cell wall carbohydrates and in auxin responses. In addition, genes involved in flavonoid synthesis, isoprenoid metabolism, and photosynthesis (dark reactions) were overrepresented in clusters showing reduced expression in the stem of low R:FR-treated plants. Consistent with these responses, low R: FR decreased the levels of flavonoids (anthocyanin, quercetin, kaempferol) and selected isoprenoid derivatives (chlorophyll, carotenoids) in the stem and severely reduced the photosynthetic capacity of this organ. However, lignin contents were unaffected. Low R: FR reduced the stem levels of jasmonate, which is a known inducer of flavonoid synthesis. The rate of stem respiration was also reduced in low R: FR-treated plants, indicating that by downsizing the stem photosynthetic apparatus and the levels of photoprotective pigments under low R: FR, tomato plants reduce the energetic cost of shade-avoidance responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available