4.8 Article

The Cytokinin Receptors of Arabidopsis Are Located Mainly to the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages 1808-1818

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.180539

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonderforschungsbereich 449]
  2. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [10-04-00638]
  4. Presidium Russian Academy of Sciences
  5. Dynasty Foundation
  6. Freie Universitat Berlin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The plant hormone cytokinin is perceived by membrane-located sensor histidine kinases. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) possesses three cytokinin receptors: ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE KINASE2 (AHK2), AHK3, and CYTOKININ RESPONSE1/AHK4. The current model predicts perception of the cytokinin signal at the plasma membrane. However, cytokinin-binding studies with membrane fractions separated by two-phase partitioning showed that in the wild type, as well as in mutants retaining only single cytokinin receptors, the major part of specific cytokinin binding was associated with endomembranes. Leaf epidermal cells of tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) expressing receptor-green fluorescent protein fusion proteins and bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis showed strong fluorescence of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) network for all three receptors. Furthermore, separation of the microsomal fraction of Arabidopsis plants expressing Myc-tagged AHK2 and AHK3 receptors by sucrose gradient centrifugation followed by immunoblotting displayed the Mg2+-dependent density shift typical of ER membrane proteins. Cytokinin-binding assays, fluorescent fusion proteins, and biochemical fractionation all showed that the large majority of cytokinin receptors are localized to the ER, suggesting a central role of this compartment in cytokinin signaling. A modified model for cytokinin signaling is proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available