4.8 Article

Kiwifruit EIL and ERF Genes Involved in Regulating Fruit Ripening

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages 1280-1292

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.157081

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation in China [30972059]
  2. Zhejiang University K.P. Chao's Hi-Tech Foundation
  3. National Research and Development Project of Transgenic Crops of China [2009ZX08009-122B]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYJD09019]
  5. China Scholar Council
  6. [B06014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) is a climacteric fruit sensitive to low concentrations of ethylene. To investigate the transcriptional mechanisms underlying kiwifruit ethylene response, transcription factors encoding four EIN3-Like (EILs) and 14 Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs) were cloned from kiwifruit. Expression of these transcription factors was examined during fruit development. The expression of transcripts of most AdERFs was higher during early fruit development, with the exception of AdERF3, which increased with maturity. Several AdERFs were apparently down-regulated by ethylene, as they were affected by the ethylene inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene and by antisense suppression of ACO (for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase) in the fruit. In contrast, AdEILs were constitutively expressed during fruit development and ripening. The transcription factors AdEIL2 and AdEIL3 activated transcription of the ripening-related genes AdACO1 and AdXET5 (xyloglucan endotransglycosylase gene) and, when overexpressed in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), stimulated ethylene production. The potential repressor AdERF9 suppressed this promoter activity. These results support a role for kiwifruit EILs and ERFs in transcriptional regulation of ripening-related genes and in the regulation of kiwifruit fruit-ripening processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available