4.8 Article

Genetic Dissection of Verticillium Wilt Resistance Mediated by Tomato Ve1

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 320-332

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.136762

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Council for Earth and Life Sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  2. Wageningen University Sandwich fellowship
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. National Science and Technology Council of Mexico
  5. Centre for BioSystems Genomics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vascular wilt diseases caused by soil-borne pathogens are among the most devastating plant diseases worldwide. The Verticillium genus includes vascular wilt pathogens with a wide host range. Although V. longisporum infects various hosts belonging to the Cruciferaceae, V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum cause vascular wilt diseases in over 200 dicotyledonous species, including economically important crops. A locus responsible for resistance against race 1 strains of V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum has been cloned from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) only. This locus, known as Ve, comprises two closely linked inversely oriented genes, Ve1 and Ve2, that encode cell surface receptor proteins of the extracellular leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein class of disease resistance proteins. Here, we show that Ve1, but not Ve2, provides resistance in tomato against race 1 strains of V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum and not against race 2 strains. Using virus-induced gene silencing in tomato, the signaling cascade downstream of Ve1 is shown to require both EDS1 and NDR1. In addition, NRC1, ACIF, MEK2, and SERK3/BAK1 also act as positive regulators of Ve1 in tomato. In conclusion, Ve1-mediated resistance signaling only partially overlaps with signaling mediated by Cf proteins, type members of the receptor-like protein class of resistance proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available