4.8 Article

Vascular Function in Grape Berries across Development and Its Relevance to Apparent Hydraulic Isolation

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 151, Issue 3, Pages 1677-1687

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.143172

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service [2005-34442-15841]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the latter stages of development in fleshy fruit, water flow through the xylem declines markedly and the requirements of transpiration and further expansion are fulfilled primarily by the phloem. We evaluated the hypothesis that cessation of water transport through the xylem results from disruption or occlusion of pedicel and berry xylem conduits (hydraulic isolation). Xylem hydraulic resistance (R(h)) was measured in developing fruit of grape (Vitis vinifera 'Chardonnay') 20 to 100 d after anthesis (DAA) and compared with observations of xylem anatomy by light and cryo-scanning electron microscopy and expression of six plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) aquaporin genes (VvPIP1;1, VvPIP1;2, VvPIP1;3, VvPIP2;1, VvPIP2;2, VvPIP2;3). There was a significant increase in whole berry R(h) and receptacle R(h) in the latter stages of ripening (80-100 DAA), which was associated with deposition of gels or solutes in many receptacle xylem conduits. Peaks in the expression of some aquaporin isoforms corresponded to lower whole berry R(h) 60 to 80 DAA, and the increase in R(h) beginning at 80 DAA correlated with decreases in the expression of the two most predominantly expressed PIP genes. Although significant, the increase in berry R(h) was not great enough, and occurred too late in development, to explain the decline in xylem flow that occurs at 60 to 75 DAA. The evidence suggests that the fruit is not hydraulically isolated from the parent plant by xylem occlusion but, rather, is hydraulically buffered by water delivered via the phloem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available