4.5 Article

The genetic characterization of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, the causal agent of walnut blight in Poland

Journal

PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages 1404-1416

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.12211

Keywords

multilocus sequence analysis; PCR melting profile; repetitive PCR; walnut blight; Xanthomonas arboricola pv; juglandis

Funding

  1. National Science Centre [2011/01/B/NZ9/01750]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaves and fruits of walnut trees exhibiting symptoms of bacterial blight were collected from six locations in Poland. Isolations on agar media resulted in 18 bacterial isolates with colony morphology resembling that of the Xanthomonas genus. PCR using X1 and X2 primers specific for Xanthomonas confirmed that all isolates belonged to this genus. In pathogenicity tests on unripe walnut fruits, all isolates caused typical black necrotic lesions covering almost the entire pericarp. Results of selected phenotypic tests indicated that characteristics of all isolates were the same as described for the type strain of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis. Genetic analyses (PCR MP, ERIC-, BOX-PCR and MLSA) showed similarities between the studied isolates and the reference strain of X.arboricola pv. juglandis CFBP 7179 originating from France. However, reference strains I-391 from Portugal and LMG 746 from the UK were different. MLSA analysis of partial sequences of the fyuA, gyrB and rpoD genes of studied isolates and respective sequences from GenBank of pathotype strains of other pathovars of X.arboricola showed that the X.arboricola pv. juglandis isolates consisted of different phylogenetic lineages. An incongruence among MLSA gene phylogenies and traces of intergenic recombination events were proved. These data suggest that the sequence analysis of several housekeeping genes is necessary for proper identification of X.arboricola pathovars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available