4.4 Article

Transferability of Newly Developed Pear SSR Markers to Other Rosaceae Species

Journal

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1271-1282

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-013-0586-z

Keywords

Simple sequence repeat (SSR); Pear; Rosaceae; Transferability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171928]
  2. National Public Benefit (Agricultural) Research Foundation of China [200903044]
  3. Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-29]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A set of 120 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) was developed from the newly assembled pear sequence and evaluated for polymorphisms in seven genotypes of pear from different genetic backgrounds. Of these, 67 (55.8 %) primer pairs produced polymorphic amplifications. Together, the 67 SSRs detected 277 alleles with an average of 4.13 per locus. Sequencing of the amplification products from randomly picked loci NAUPy31a and NAUpy53a verified the presence of the SSR loci. When the 67 primer pairs were tested on 96 individual members of eight species in the Rosaceae family, 61.2 % (41/67) of the tested SSRs successfully amplified a PCR product in at least one of the Rosaceae genera. The transferability from pear to different species varied from 58.2 % (apple) to 11.9 % (cherry). The ratio of transferability also reflected the closer relationships within Maloideae over Prunoideae. Two pear SSR markers, NAUpy43c and NAUpy55k, could distinguish the 20 different apple genotypes thoroughly, and UPGMA cluster analysis grouped them into three groups at the similarity level of 0.56. The high level of polymorphism and good transferability of pear SSRs to Rosaceae species indicate their promise for application to future molecular screening, map construction, and comparative genomic studies among pears and other Rosaceae species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available