4.7 Article

The ectopic expression of the wheat Puroindoline genes increase germ size and seed oil content in transgenic corn

Journal

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 4-5, Pages 353-365

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-010-9679-3

Keywords

Corn; Puroindoline; Oil content; Germ size; Transformation

Funding

  1. Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research
  2. Dow AgroSciences
  3. USDA-ARS [2004-35301-14538, 2007-35301-18135]
  4. Montana Agricultural Experiment Station
  5. National Science Foundation [IBN-0444031, IOS-0815104, EPS 0236913, MCB 0455318, DBI 0521587]
  6. USDA [2006-35100-17220, 2008-35318-18649]
  7. Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation
  8. K-IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE) of National Institute of Health [P20RR16475]
  9. Kansas State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant oil content and composition improvement is a major goal of plant breeding and biotechnology. The Puroindoline a and b (PINA and PINB) proteins together control whether wheat seeds are soft or hard textured and share a similar structure to that of plant non-specific lipid-transfer proteins. Here we transformed corn (Zea mays L.) with the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) puroindoline genes (Pina and Pinb) to assess their effects upon seed oil content and quality. Pina and Pinb coding sequences were introduced into corn under the control of a corn Ubiquitin promoter. Three Pina/Pinb expression positive transgenic events were evaluated over two growing seasons. The results showed that Pin expression increased germ size significantly without negatively impacting seed size. Germ yield increased 33.8% while total seed oil content was increased by 25.23%. Seed oil content increases were primarily the result of increased germ size. This work indicates that higher oil content corn hybrids having increased food or feed value could be produced via puroindoline expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available