4.6 Article

Variable-angle total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy of intact cells of Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal

PLANT METHODS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-7-27

Keywords

Quantitative; VA-TIRFM; optical analysis; intact cell; cell wall

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB809103, 2007CB108703]
  2. CAS/SAFEA [20090491019]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000595, 30730009, 30821007, 30900072]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-YW-L08, KSCX2-EW-J-1]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM) is a powerful tool for observing fluorescently labeled molecules on the plasma membrane surface of animal cells. However, the utility of TIRFM in plant cell studies has been limited by the fact that plants have cell walls, thick peripheral layers surrounding the plasma membrane. Recently, a new technique known as variable-angle epifluorescence microscopy (VAEM) was developed to circumvent this problem. However, the lack of a detailed analysis of the optical principles underlying VAEM has limited its applications in plant-cell biology. Results: Here, we present theoretical and experimental evidence supporting the use of variable-angle TIRFM in observations of intact plant cells. We show that when total internal reflection occurs at the cell wall/cytosol interface with an appropriate angle of incidence, an evanescent wave field of constant depth is produced inside the cytosol. Results of experimental TIRFM observations of the dynamic behaviors of phototropin 1 (a membrane receptor protein) and clathrin light chain (a vesicle coat protein) support our theoretical analysis. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that variable-angle TIRFM is appropriate for quantitative live imaging of cells in intact tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available