4.2 Review

Consensus paper of the WFSBP Task Force on Biological Markers: Criteria for biomarkers and endophenotypes of schizophrenia part I: Neurophysiology

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 280-290

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2015.1050061

Keywords

endophenotypes; biomarkers; schizophrenia; electrophysiological measures; diagnosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Ontario Mental Health Foundation (OMHF)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Brain and Behaviour Research Foundation
  4. Temerty Family
  5. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Foundation
  6. Campbell Institute
  7. Grant Family
  8. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The neurophysiological components that have been proposed as biomarkers or as endophenotypes for schizophrenia can be measured through electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), polysomnography (PSG), registration of event-related potentials (ERPs), assessment of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) and antisaccade paradigms. Most of them demonstrate deficits in schizophrenia, show at least moderate stability over time and do not depend on clinical status, which means that they fulfil the criteria as valid endophenotypes for genetic studies. Deficits in cortical inhibition and plasticity measured using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques seem promising markers of outcome and prognosis. However the utility of these markers as biomarkers for predicting conversion to psychosis, response to treatments, or for tracking disease progression needs to be further studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available