4.8 Article

Resetting and regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS C expression during Arabidopsis reproductive development

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 918-931

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03776.x

Keywords

FLOWERING LOCUS C; epigenetic resetting; embryogenesis; gametogenesis; vernalization; FLC regulators

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Research Promotion Fund [KRF-2005-070-C00129]
  2. MEST/KOSEF to the Environmental Biotechnology National Core Research Center [R15-2003-012-01001-0]
  3. National Institutes of Health [National Institutes of Health Grant 1R01GM079525]
  4. National Science Foundation [0209786]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2006-312-C00672] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ00704920091136300] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Sys
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [0209786] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/J/00000581] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The epigenetic regulation of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) is one of the critical factors that determine flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Although many FLC regulators, and their effects on FLC chromatin, have been extensively studied, the epigenetic resetting of FLC has not yet been thoroughly characterized. Here, we investigate the FLC expression during gametogenesis and embryogenesis using FLC::GUS transgenic plants and RNA analysis. Regardless of the epigenetic state in adult plants, FLC expression disappeared in gametophytes. Subsequently, FLC expression was reactivated after fertilization in embryos, but not in the endosperm. Both parental alleles contributed equally to the expression of FLC in embryos. Surprisingly, the reactivation of FLC in early embryos was independent of FRIGIDA (FRI) and SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA 4 (SUF4) activities. Instead, FRI, SUF4 and autonomous-pathway genes determined the level of FLC expression only in late embryogenesis. Many FLC regulators exhibited expression patterns similar to that of FLC, indicating potential roles in FLC reprogramming. An FVE mutation caused ectopic expression of FLC in the endosperm. A mutation in PHOTOPERIOD-INDEPENDENT EARLY FLOWERING 1 caused defects in FLC reactivation in early embryogenesis, and maintenance of full FLC expression in late embryogenesis. We also show that the polycomb group complex components, Fertilization-Independent endosperm and MEDEA, which mediate epigenetic regulation in seeds, are not relevant for FLC reprogramming. Based on our results, we propose that FLC reprogramming is composed of three phases: (i) repression in gametogenesis, (ii) reactivation in early embryogenesis and (iii) maintenance in late embryogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available