4.8 Article

EZ-Rhizo: integrated software for the fast and accurate measurement of root system architecture

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 945-956

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03739.x

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; root architecture; image analysis; software; natural variation; principal component analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. BBSRC
  2. BBSRC [BB/F001673/1, BB/D001528/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F001673/1, P12750, BB/C500595/1, BB/D001528/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The root system is essential for the growth and development of plants. In addition to anchoring the plant in the ground, it is the site of uptake of water and minerals from the soil. Plant root systems show an astonishing plasticity in their architecture, which allows for optimal exploitation of diverse soil structures and conditions. The signalling pathways that enable plants to sense and respond to changes in soil conditions, in particular nutrient supply, are a topic of intensive research, and root system architecture (RSA) is an important and obvious phenotypic output. At present, the quantitative description of RSA is labour intensive and time consuming, even using the currently available software, and the lack of a fast RSA measuring tool hampers forward and quantitative genetics studies. Here, we describe EZ-Rhizo: a Windows-integrated and semi-automated computer program designed to detect and quantify multiple RSA parameters from plants growing on a solid support medium. The method is non-invasive, enabling the user to follow RSA development over time. We have successfully applied EZ-Rhizo to evaluate natural variation in RSA across 23 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, and have identified new RSA determinants as a basis for future quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available