4.8 Article

The pentatricopeptide repeat protein OTP82 is required for RNA editing of plastid ndhB and ndhG transcripts

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 339-349

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04059.x

Keywords

RNA editing; pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein; NAD(P)H dehydrogenase; plastid; DYW motif; Arabidopsis

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [16085206, 17GS0316]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan [GPN0008]
  3. Australian Research Council [CE0561495]
  4. Australian Government Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research [CG120098]
  5. Region of Alsace
  6. University of Western Australia
  7. West Australian State Premier's Fellow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Several hundred nucleus-encoded factors are required for regulating gene expression in plant organelles. Among them, the most numerous are the members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family. We found that PPR protein OTP82 is essential for RNA editing of the ndhB-9 and ndhG-1 sites within transcripts encoding subunits of chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase. Despite the defects in RNA editing, otp82 did not show any phenotypes in NDH activity, stability or interaction with photosystem I, suggesting that the RNA editing events mediated by OTP82 are functionally silent even though they induce amino acid alterations. In agreement with this result, both sites are partially edited even in the wild type, implying the possibility that a single gene produces heterogeneous proteins that are functionally equivalent. Although only five nucleotides separate the ndhB-8 and ndhB-9 sites, the ndhB-8 site is normally edited in otp82 mutants, suggesting that both sites are recognized by different PPR proteins. OTP82 falls into the DYW subclass containing conserved C-terminal E and DYW motifs. As in CRR22 and CRR28, the DYW motif present in OTP82 is not essential for RNA editing in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available