4.8 Article

Heterologous complementation of yeast reveals a new putative function for chloroplast m-type thioredoxin

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 127-135

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2000.00943.x

Keywords

yeast complementation; Arabidopsis; chloroplast; thioredoxin; oxidative stress; redox regulation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the chloroplast of higher plants, two types of thioredoxins (TRX), namely TRX m which shows high similarity to prokaryotic thioredoxins and TRX f which is more closely related to eukaryotic thioredoxins, have been found and biochemically characterized, but little is known about their physiological specificity with respect to their target(s). Here, we tested, in vivo, the ability of organelle-specific TRX from Arabidopsis thaliana to compensate for TRX deficiency of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain. Seven plant organellar TRX (four of the m type, two of the f type and a newly discovered TRX x of prokaryotic type) were expressed in yeast in a putative mature form. None of these heterologous TRX were able to restore growth on sulphate or methionine sulphoxide of the mutant cells. When we tested their ability to rescue the oxidant-hypersensitive phenotype of the TRX-deficient strain, we found that TRX m and TRX x, but not TRX f, affected the tolerance to oxidative stress induced by either hydrogen peroxide or an alkyl hydroperoxide. Athm1, Athm2, Athm4 and Athx induced hydrogen peroxide tolerance like the endogenous yeast thioredoxins. Unexpectedly, Athm3 had a hypersensitizing effect towards oxidative stress. The presence of functional heterologous TRX was checked in the recombinant clones tested, supporting distinct abilities for organelle-specific plant TRX to compensate for TRX deficiency in yeast. We propose a new function for the prokaryotic-type chloroplastic TRX as an antioxidant and provide in vivo evidence for different roles of chloroplastic TRX isoforms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available