4.6 Article

Adventitious regeneration in blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L.) and assessment of genetic stability in regenerants

Journal

PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 265-275

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10725-010-9474-9

Keywords

Adventitious organogenesis; Cytokinins; Auxins; Chromosome number; Flow cytometry; Isoperoxidase

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaves of blackberry cultivar aanska Bestrna was examined using 30 different combinations of treatment. Young, fully expanded leaves taken from in vitro proliferating shoots were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing either N (6)-benzylaminopurine (BAP) (2.0 mg l(-1)) or thidiazuron (TDZ) (1.0 and 2.0 mg l(-1)) alone, or either of them combined with indol-3-butyric acid (IBA), alpha-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) at different concentrations (0.1, 1.0 and 2.0 mg l(-1)). Indirect shoot formation was observed in 12 different treatments, though the efficacy varied greatly among types and concentrations of plant growth regulators. TDZ at 1.0 mg l(-1), applied either alone or combined with IBA, was significantly more effective than BAP in inducing shoot regeneration. The highest regeneration rate (41.66%) was obtained on medium containing TDZ alone. Cytological, flow cytometry and isozyme analyses were used for screening of genetic stability/instability in regenerants. Cytological study, based on chromosome counts in root tip meristems, and flow cytometry analysis indicated that adventitious shoots of aanska Bestrna are tetraploid with 2n = 4x = 28 as well as those derived from axillary buds. However, a study conducted on the peroxidase patterns of the different blackberry regenerating lines showed differences between some lines and control plants (in vivo plants and micropropagated plants). These differences were visible with 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMBZ) as hydrogenous donor for peroxidase detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available