4.6 Article

Differential antioxidative responses of indica rice cultivars to drought stress

Journal

PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 51-59

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10725-009-9418-4

Keywords

Antioxidants; Indica rice; Lipid peroxidation; Oxidative damage; Polyethylene glycol; Radical scavenging

Categories

Funding

  1. Bose Institute and Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated the linkages between drought stress, oxidative damages and variations in antioxidants in the three rice varieties IR-29 (salt-sensitive), Pokkali (salt-tolerant) and aromatic Pusa Basmati (PB), to elucidate the antioxidative protective mechanism governing differential drought tolerance. Water deficit, induced by 20% (w/v) polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000), provoked severe damages in IR-29 and PB in the form of huge chlorophyll degradation and elevated H2O2, malondialdehyde and lipoxygenase (LOX, EC 1.13.11.12) levels as compared to Pokkali. The protein oxidation was more conspicuous in IR-29. Increment in antioxidants, particularly flavonoids and phenolics was several folds higher over control in Pokkali, while much lesser in IR-29 and PB. The activity of catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) and superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1) were decreased in IR-29 and PB, but unaltered in Pokkali. However, marked drought-induced increase in guaiacol peroxidase (GPX, EC 1.11.1.7) activity was noted in both IR-29 and PB. Induction in radical scavenging activity, being the maximum in IR-29, and increased reducing power ability in all the cultivars, accompanied with drought stress, were observed as a defense mechanism. The novelty of our work is that it showed the aromatic rice PB behaving more closely to IR-29 in greater susceptibility to dehydration stress, while the salt-tolerant Pokkali also showed effective drought tolerance properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available