4.1 Article

The comparison of several colour indices for the photographic recording of canopy phenology of Fagus crenata Blume in eastern Japan

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY & DIVERSITY
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 67-77

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2011.563759

Keywords

canopy phenology; deciduous broadleaved forest; digital image; HSL; RGB

Categories

Funding

  1. British Embassy, Tokyo
  2. British Council
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19688012]
  4. Microsoft Research
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G014418/1]
  6. NERC [NE/G014418/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To understand how forests and woodland respond to global climate change, phenological observations are being made at a number of sites worldwide. Recently, digital cameras have been deployed as part of the existing network of ecosystem CO2 flux towers to provide a time-series of canopy images, and various numerical indices have so far been used by different authors. Aims: To identify which are the most effective colour indices to calculate from the signals extracted from digital cameras, in order to provide recommendations to the scientific community. Methods: Sample images of a Japanese beech (Fagus crenata) forest on Mt. Tsukuba (Japan) were used to define and calculate 12 colour signals and vegetation indices. Results: Although the strength of green signal and green excess index were reliable indicators for estimating foliage growth period, the indices were susceptible to low-visibility weather conditions and distance from the camera. Hue provided a robust metric, showing much less scatter during the vegetative period and a good indication of spring bud break. The bud break dates derived from the indices were slightly earlier than those assessed by visual observation, while the abscission dates were later. Conclusions: We propose that of all the candidate colour indices, hue is the most promising for the detection of bud break as it was least affected by atmospheric conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available