4.1 Article

Going for the slow burn: why should possession of a low maximum growth rate be advantageous for microalgae?

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY & DIVERSITY
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 179-189

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17550870903207268

Keywords

competition; death; growth rate; phytoplankton; quota model

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Phytoplankton show a wide range of maximum growth rates (mu(max)), with no obvious advantage to having a low mu(max). Aims: To explore advantages for phytoplankton in having mu(max) values commensurate with the rate of nutrient supply in their environment, making use of a mechanistic model describing their growth. Methods: In contrast with the typical construction of quota-based models of microalgal growth, which scale the maximum nutrient uptake rate to mu(max), a more realistic description of excess nutrient transport capacity endows organisms of lower mu(max) with a competitive advantage for nutrient acquisition. This, in turn, enables the retention of a higher organismal nutrient status at low-nutrient concentrations. Thence low mu(max) organisms may be expected to have lower intrinsic death rates, and also faster response times to capitalise on nutrient spikes. Results: Of the traits modelled, the lowering of death rate appears the most important, enabling cells of low mu(max) to out-compete their high mu(max) counterparts at low-nutrient concentration. An ability to recover more rapidly from nutrient stress is of lesser importance, and is unable to counter differences in mu(max). Conclusions: Descriptions of features such as those modelled define properties of plankton functional types and also provide trade-off characteristics for placement within models considering emergent properties of plankton communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available