4.3 Article

Canopy structure, photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen distribution in adjacent mixed and monospecific stands of Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY
Volume 213, Issue 5, Pages 821-829

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-012-0044-2

Keywords

Canopy light profile; Resource allocation; Photosynthetically active radiation; Photosynthesis; Nitrogen; Invasive species

Funding

  1. Buffalo State College Office of Undergraduate Research
  2. Tifft Nature Preserve
  3. Buffalo State College School of Natural and Social Sciences
  4. Buffalo State College Research Foundation
  5. Li-Cor Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shifts in canopy structure associated with nonnative plant invasions may interact with species-specific patterns of canopy resource allocation to reinforce the invasion process. We documented differences in canopy light availability and canopy resource allocation in adjacent monospecific and mixed stands of Phragmites australis and Typha spp. in a Great Lakes coastal wetland presently undergoing Phragmites invasion to better understand how light availability influences leaf nitrogen content (N-mass) and photosynthetic capacity (A(max)) in these species. Due to their horizontally oriented leaves, light attenuates more rapidly in monospecific stands of Phragmites than in monospecific stands of Typha, where leaves are more vertically-oriented. Whereas Typha canopies followed our prediction that patterns of N-mass and A(max) should closely parallel patterns of canopy light availability, N-mass and A(max) were consistent throughout Phragmites' canopies. Moreover, we observed overall greater N-mass and lower photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in leaves of Phragmites than in leaves of Typha. Improved understanding of the link between N-mass and A(max) in these canopies should improve our understanding of carbon and nitrogen cycling consequences of Phragmites invasion in wetland ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available