4.7 Article

Effects of Wheat streak mosaic virus on Root Development and Water-Use Efficiency of Hard Red Winter Wheat

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 766-770

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-94-6-0766

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ogallala Aquifer Initiative
  2. United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service
  3. Kansas State University
  4. Texas AgriLife Research
  5. Texas AgriLife Extension Service
  6. Texas Tech University
  7. West Texas AM University
  8. Texas Cropping Systems Initiative
  9. Texas Wheat Producers Board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to determine the effects of Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), a member of the family Potyviridae, on root development and water-use efficiency (WUE) of two hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars, one susceptible and one resistant to WSMV. In the greenhouse studies, wheat cultivars were grown under three water regimes of 30, 60, and 80% soil saturation capacity. After inoculation with WSMV, plants were grown for approximately 4 weeks and then harvested. Root and shoot weights were measured to determine the effect of the disease on biomass. In all water treatments, root biomass and WUE of inoculated susceptible plants were significantly less (P < 0.05) than those of the noninoculated control plants. However, in the resistant cultivar, significance was only found in the 30 and 60% treatments for root weight and WUE, respectively. Field studies were also conducted under three water regimes based on reference evapotranspiration rates. Significant reductions in forage, grain yield, and crop WUE were observed in the inoculated susceptible plots compared with the noninoculated plots. Both studies demonstrated that wheat streak mosaic reduces WUE, which is a major concern in the Texas Panhandle because of limited availability of water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available