4.5 Article

Overexpression of Glycine soja WRKY20 enhances both drought and salt tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

Journal

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 77-86

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-014-0463-y

Keywords

GsWRKY20; Transgenic alfalfa; Drought tolerance; Salt tolerance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371544]
  2. Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [212049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High salinity and drought are major abiotic factors limiting productivity of alfalfa. GsWRKY20 encodes a WRKY-type transcription factor from Glycine soja. In our previous study, heterologous expression of GsWRKY20 in Arabidopsis significantly increased the drought tolerance of Arabidopsis. In order to assess whether GsWRKY20 is also involved in salt stress and breed transgenic forage legume with high drought and salt tolerance, GsWRKY20 was overexpressed in alfalfa. We found that transgenic alfalfa overexpressing GsWRKY20 showed increased drought and salt tolerance. Transgenic alfalfa grew well under high-salinity and water-deficit conditions, while wild-type plants exhibited leaf chlorosis, growth retardation and even death. Lower relative membrane permeability and lower malondialdehyde content were observed in transgenic alfalfa, and more free proline and soluble sugars were accumulated in transgenic alfalfa compared with wild-type plants under high-salinity and water-deficit conditions. Transgenic alfalfa accumulated less Na+ and more K+ in both leaves and roots under high-salinity treatment. In addition, transgenic alfalfa had much thicker cuticle, which could decrease the water loss of plants under water deficit. Taken together, these results reveal an important role for GsWRKY20 in salt and drought stress, and the transgenic alfalfa could be used for farming in salt-affected as well as arid and semi-arid areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available