4.5 Article

Zeatin-induced one-step in vitro cloning affects the vegetative growth of cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) micropropagules over stem cuttings

Journal

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 231-240

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-008-9366-0

Keywords

acclimatization; cytokinin; evaluation; morphology; shoot proliferation; rooting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shoot proliferation and rooting of three cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) cultivars Bergman, Pilgrim, and Stevens were obtained in vitro on a modified nutrient medium containing zeatin following a one-step procedure. Bergman and Stevens differed in terms of shoot height, leaf number per shoot, rooting frequency, root number per explant, and root length; this was manifested with various concentrations of zeatin. Shoots proliferated and roots developed best when nodal segments were cultured in the medium supplemented with very low concentration of zeatin (2-4 mu M). Such zeatin-induced tissue culture (TC) shoots of Bergman, Pilgrim, and Stevens were rooted ex vitro and compared with those propagated by conventional softwood cuttings (SC) for growth and morphology over four growth seasons. Significant interactions for leaf number per upright were observed among the treatments. The cultivars differed in terms of runner number per plant, upright length, number of leaves per upright, and shoot vigor. The propagation method had an effect on morphology of cranberry plants. The TC plants produced more runners and uprights with more leaves per upright than the conventional cuttings. This increase in vegetative growth of in vitro-derived plants over stem cuttings varied among genotypes. In vitro culture on zeatin-containing nutrient medium apparently induces the juvenile branching characteristics that favored enhanced vegetative growth with more shoots and leaf production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available