4.7 Article

Different effects of night versus day high temperature on rice quality and accumulation profiling of rice grain proteins during grain filling

Journal

PLANT CELL REPORTS
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 1641-1659

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-011-1074-2

Keywords

Rice; Night versus day high temperature; Rice quality; Grain proteins accumulation; Grain filling

Categories

Funding

  1. National 973 Key Fundamental Research Program [2008CB117006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High temperature has adverse effects on rice yield and quality. The different influences of night high temperature (NHT) and day high temperature (DHT) on rice quality and seed protein accumulation profiles during grain filling in indica rice '9311' were studied in this research. The treatment temperatures of the control, NHT, and DHT were 28A degrees C/20A degrees C, 27A degrees C/35A degrees C, and 35A degrees C/27A degrees C, respectively, and all the treatments were maintained for 20 days. The result of rice quality analysis indicated that compared with DHT, NHT exerted less effect on head rice rate and chalkiness, whereas greater effect on grain weight. Moreover, the dynamic accumulation change profiles of 61 protein spots, differentially accumulated and successfully identified under NHT and DHT conditions, were performed by proteomic approach. The results also showed that the different suppressed extent of accumulation amount of cyPPDKB might result in different grain chalkiness between NHT and DHT. Most identified isoforms of proteins, such as PPDK and pullulanase, displayed different accumulation change patterns between NHT and DHT. In addition, compared with DHT, NHT resulted in the unique accumulation patterns of stress and defense proteins. Taken together, the mechanisms of seed protein accumulation profiles induced by NHT and DHT during grain filling should be different in rice, and the potential molecular basis is discussed in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available