4.7 Article

Phytochrome B dynamics departs from photoequilibrium in the field

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 606-617

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13445

Keywords

light environment; phytochrome; shade avoidance; thermal reversion

Categories

Funding

  1. FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network [316723]
  2. Horizon 2020 Framework Programme [634942]
  3. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0025/2013]
  4. HFSP [RGP0025/2013]
  5. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT-2015-1796]
  6. University of Buenos Aires [20020100100437]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vegetation shade is characterized by marked decreases in the red/far-red ratio and photosynthetic irradiance. The activity of phytochrome in the field has typically been described by its photoequilibrium, defined by the photochemical properties of the pigment in combination with the spectral distribution of the light. This approach represents an oversimplification because phytochrome B (phyB) activity depends not only on its photochemical reactions but also on its rates of synthesis, degradation, translocation to the nucleus, and thermal reversion. To account for these complex cellular reactions, we used a model to simulate phyB activity under a range of field conditions. The model provided values of phyB activity that in turn predicted hypocotyl growth in the field with reasonable accuracy. On the basis of these observations, we define two scenarios, one is under shade, in cloudy weather, at the extremes of the photoperiod or in the presence of rapid fluctuations of the light environment caused by wind-induced movements of the foliage, where phyB activity departs from photoequilibrium and becomes affected by irradiance and temperature in addition to the spectral distribution. The other scenario is under full sunlight, where phyB activity responds mainly to the spectral distribution of the light.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available