4.7 Article

Mesophyll cells of C4 plants have fewer chloroplasts than those of closely related C3 plants

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 2587-2600

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12331

Keywords

C-3-C-4 intermediate; C-4 evolution; C-4 photosynthesis; Kranz anatomy; mesophyll conductance

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [154273-2012, 155258-2008]
  2. Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) GCIAR-Canada linkage fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution of C-4 photosynthesis from C-3 ancestors eliminates ribulose bisphosphate carboxylation in the mesophyll (M) cell chloroplast while activating phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylation in the cytosol. These changes may lead to fewer chloroplasts and different chloroplast positioning within M cells. To evaluate these possibilities, we compared chloroplast number, size and position in M cells of closely related C3,C-3-C-4 intermediate and C-4 species from 12 lineages of C-4 evolution. All C-3 species had more chloroplasts per M cell area than their C-4 relatives in high-light growth conditions. C-3 species also had higher chloroplast coverage of the M cell periphery than C-4 species, particularly opposite intercellular air spaces. In M cells from 10 of the 12 C-4 lineages, a greater fraction of the chloroplast envelope was pulled away from the plasmalemma in the C-4 species than their C-3 relatives. C-3-C-4 intermediate species generally exhibited similar patterns as their C-3 relatives. We interpret these results to reflect adaptive shifts that facilitate efficient C-4 function by enhancing diffusive access to the site of primary carbon fixation in the cytosol. Fewer chloroplasts in C-4 M cells would also reduce shading of the bundle sheath chloroplasts, which also generate energy required by C-4 photosynthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available