4.7 Article

A biomarker based on gene expression indicates plant water status in controlled and natural environments

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 2175-2189

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12127

Keywords

Helianthus annuus L; drought; FTSW; indicator; leaf water potential; soil water content; soil water deficit; sunflower; transcriptomic

Categories

Funding

  1. French public funds for competitiveness clusters (FUI)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. Government of the Region Midi-Pyrenees
  4. Departmental Board of Aveyron (France)
  5. Cities Cluster of Rodez (France)
  6. Syngenta Seeds
  7. Region Midi-Pyrenees

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant or soil water status is required in many scientific fields to understand plant responses to drought. Because the transcriptomic response to abiotic conditions, such as water deficit, reflects plant water status, genomic tools could be used to develop a new type of molecular biomarker. Using the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) as a model species to study the transcriptomic response to water deficit both in greenhouse and field conditions, we specifically identified three genes that showed an expression pattern highly correlated to plant water status as estimated by the pre-dawn leaf water potential, fraction of transpirable soil water, soil water content or fraction of total soil water in controlled conditions. We developed a generalized linear model to estimate these classical water status indicators from the expression levels of the three selected genes under controlled conditions. This estimation was independent of the four tested genotypes and the stage (pre- or post-flowering) of the plant. We further validated this gene expression biomarker under field conditions for four genotypes in three different trials, over a large range of water status, and we were able to correct their expression values for a large diurnal sampling period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available