4.7 Article

Structural assessment of the impact of environmental constraints on Arabidopsis thaliana leaf growth: a 3D approach

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 1631-1646

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02514.x

Keywords

3D imaging; cell number; cell volume; day length; epidermis; leaf growth; leaf thickness; mesophyll; soil water deficit; stomatal conductance

Categories

Funding

  1. Agropolis Fondation, Montpellier, France [RTRA 07047]
  2. Agron-Omics, a European sixth framework integrated project [LSHG-CT-2006-037704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Light and soil water content affect leaf surface area expansion through modifications in epidermal cell numbers and area, while effects on leaf thickness and mesophyll cell volumes are far less documented. Here, three-dimensional imaging was applied in a study of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf growth to determine leaf thickness and the cellular organization of mesophyll tissues under moderate soil water deficit and two cumulative light conditions. In contrast to surface area, thickness was highly conserved in response to water deficit under both low and high cumulative light regimes. Unlike epidermal and palisade mesophyll tissues, no reductions in cell number were observed in the spongy mesophyll; cells had rather changed in volume and shape. Furthermore, leaf features of a selection of genotypes affected in leaf functioning were analysed. The low-starch mutant pgm had very thick leaves because of unusually large palisade mesophyll cells, together with high levels of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. By means of an open stomata mutant and a 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase overexpressor, it was shown that stomatal conductance does not necessarily have a major impact on leaf dimensions and cellular organization, pointing to additional mechanisms for the control of CO2 diffusion under high and low stomatal conductance, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available