4.7 Article

Shoot-supplied ammonium targets the root auxin influx carrier AUX1 and inhibits lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 933-946

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02295.x

Keywords

ABA; ammonium toxicity; auxin transport; root; shoot-derived signal

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB109303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30771285]
  3. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [217277-2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deposition of ammonium (NH(4)+) from the atmosphere is a substantial environmental problem. While toxicity resulting from root exposure to NH(4)+ is well studied, little is known about how shoot-supplied ammonium (SSA) affects root growth. In this study, we show that SSA significantly affects lateral root (LR) development. We show that SSA inhibits lateral root primordium (LRP) emergence, but not LRP initiation, resulting in significantly impaired LR number. We show that the inhibition is independent of abscisic acid (ABA) signalling and sucrose uptake in shoots but relates to the auxin response in roots. Expression analyses of an auxin-responsive reporter, DR5:GUS, and direct assays of auxin transport demonstrated that SSA inhibits root acropetal (rootward) auxin transport while not affecting basipetal (shootward) transport or auxin sensitivity of root cells. Mutant analyses indicated that the auxin influx carrier AUX1, but not the auxin efflux carriers PIN-FORMED (PIN)1 or PIN2, is required for this inhibition of LRP emergence and the observed auxin response. We found that AUX1 expression was modulated by SSA in vascular tissues rather than LR cap cells in roots. Taken together, our results suggest that SSA inhibits LRP emergence in Arabidopsis by interfering with AUX1-dependent auxin transport from shoot to root.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available