4.7 Review

Phytoextraction of toxic metals: a central role for glutathione

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 334-346

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02338.x

Keywords

accumulation; antioxidant; chelation; metal homeostasis; metal pollution; signalling; transgenics; transporter

Categories

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India
  2. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO-Belgium) [G.0807.09, G.090910]
  3. agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT-Flanders)
  4. Hasselt University [BOF08G01, BOFN0705]
  5. Methusalem project [08M03VGRJ]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phytoextraction has a promising potential as an environmentally friendly clean-up method for soils contaminated with toxic metals. To improve the development of efficient phytoextraction strategies, better knowledge regarding metal uptake, translocation and detoxification in planta is a prerequisite. This review highlights our current understanding on these mechanisms, and their impact on plant growth and health. Special attention is paid to the central role of glutathione (GSH) in this process. Because of the high affinity of metals to thiols and as a precursor for phytochelatins (PCs), GSH is an essential metal chelator. Being an important antioxidant, a direct link between metal detoxification and the oxidative challenge in plants growing on contaminated soils is observed, where GSH could be a key player. In addition, as redox couple, oxidized and reduced GSH transmits specific information, in this way tuning cellular signalling pathways under environmental stress conditions. Possible improvements of phytoextraction could be achieved by using transgenic plants or plant-associated microorganisms. Joined efforts should be made to cope with the challenges faced with phytoextraction in order to successfully implement this technique in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available