4.7 Article

Sex-related adaptive responses of Populus cathayana to photoperiod transitions

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1401-1411

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02007.x

Keywords

leaf senescence; lipid peroxidation; photoperiod adaptation; phytohormones; sex-specific responses; ultrastructure

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30525036]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-N-064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Populus cathayana Rehd., a dioecious tree species, occupies a wide range of habitats in southwest China. Both males and females were grown under two regimes of photoperiod, from mid-length to short-day photoperiod (SD shift), or to long-day photoperiod (LD shift). SD shift triggered leaf senescence in both males and females by decreasing net photosynthesis rate (A), transpiration (E), and chlorophyll pigment (Chl), non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) and indoleacetic acid (IAA) contents, while increasing abscisic acid (ABA), malonaldehyde (MDA) and free proline (Pro) contents. The antioxidant enzyme (e.g. POD, CAT and SOD) activities and capability to maintain ultrastructural integrity also decreased under SD shift. Males exhibited faster leaf senescence than did females, as shown by greater decreases in A, E, Chl and IAA. However, males maintained a less senescent stage than did females, as indicated by higher values of A, Chl, NSC, IAA and antioxidant enzyme activities. Conversely, A, E, NSC and IAA contents and antioxidant enzyme activities were enhanced by lower O-2(center dot-) in females, whereas reduced by higher O-2(center dot-) in males under LD shift. Such sex-dependent responses of P. cathayana to photoperiod transitions showed that males and females possess different adaptabilities, which may relate to sex-specific leaf senescence speed under changing environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available