4.8 Article

Comparative Transcriptome Atlases Reveal Altered Gene Expression Modules between Two Cleomaceae C3 and C4 Plant Species

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 3243-3260

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.123752

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EXC 1028, IRTG 1525, WE 2231/9-1]
  2. HHU Biomedical Research Center (BMFZ)
  3. RNA-seq analysis
  4. MSU High Performance Computing Cluster
  5. RNA-seq data

Ask authors/readers for more resources

C-4 photosynthesis outperforms the ancestral C-3 state in a wide range of natural and agro-ecosystems by affording higher water-use and nitrogen-use efficiencies. It therefore represents a prime target for engineering novel, high-yielding crops by introducing the trait into C-3 backgrounds. However, the genetic architecture of C-4 photosynthesis remains largely unknown. To define the divergence in gene expression modules between C-3 and C-4 photosynthesis during leaf ontogeny, we generated comprehensive transcriptome atlases of two Cleomaceae species, Gynandropsis gynandra (C-4) and Tarenaya hassleriana (C-3), by RNA sequencing. Overall, the gene expression profiles appear remarkably similar between the C-3 and C-4 species. We found that known C-4 genes were recruited to photosynthesis from different expression domains in C-3, including typical housekeeping gene expression patterns in various tissues as well as individual heterotrophic tissues. Furthermore, we identified a structure-related module recruited from the C-3 root. Comparison of gene expression patterns with anatomy during leaf ontogeny provided insight into genetic features of Kranz anatomy. Altered expression of developmental factors and cell cycle genes is associated with a higher degree of endoreduplication in enlarged C-4 bundle sheath cells. A delay in mesophyll differentiation apparent both in the leaf anatomy and the transcriptome allows for extended vein formation in the C-4 leaf.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available