4.8 Article

Physiological Genomics of Response to Soil Drying in Diverse Arabidopsis Accessions

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 893-914

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.096180

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0618347, DEB-0618294, DEB-0618302]
  2. California Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. University of Texas Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1022196] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arabidopsis thaliana, like many species, is characterized by abundant genetic variation. This variation is rapidly being cataloged at the sequence level, but careful dissection of genetic variation in whole-organism responses to stresses encountered in the natural environment are lacking; this functional variation can be exploited as a natural mutant screen to determine gene function. Here, we document physiological and transcriptomic response to soil drying in 17 natural accessions of Arabidopsis. By imposing ecologically realistic stress conditions, we found that acclimation in Arabidopsis involved a strong signature of increased investment in photosynthesis, carbohydrate turnover, and root growth. Our results extend previous work in the Columbia accession suggesting that abscisic acid signaling pathways play an important role in drought stress response. We also identified several mechanisms, including an increase in leaf nitrogen concentration and upregulation of two-component signaling relays, that were common to most natural accessions but had not been identified in studies using only the Columbia accession. Principal component analysis reveals strong correlations between suites of genes and specific physiological responses to stress. The functional variants we identified may represent adaptive mutations in natural habitats and useful variants for agronomic improvement of crop species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available