4.8 Review

Coping with Stresses: Roles of Calcium- and Calcium/Calmodulin-Regulated Gene Expression

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 2010-2032

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.084988

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Department of Energy
  4. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  5. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  6. Office of Naval Research
  7. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1052030] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abiotic and biotic stresses are major limiting factors of crop yields and cause billions of dollars of losses annually around the world. It is hoped that understanding at the molecular level how plants respond to adverse conditions and adapt to a changing environment will help in developing plants that can better cope with stresses. Acquisition of stress tolerance requires orchestration of a multitude of biochemical and physiological changes, and most of these depend on changes in gene expression. Research during the last two decades has established that different stresses cause signal-specific changes in cellular Ca2+ level, which functions as a messenger in modulating diverse physiological processes that are important for stress adaptation. In recent years, many Ca2+ and Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM) binding transcription factors (TFs) have been identified in plants. Functional analyses of some of these TFs indicate that they play key roles in stress signaling pathways. Here, we review recent progress in this area with emphasis on the roles of Ca2+- and Ca2+/CaM-regulated transcription in stress responses. We will discuss emerging paradigms in the field, highlight the areas that need further investigation, and present some promising novel high-throughput tools to address Ca2+-regulated transcriptional networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available