4.8 Article

Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Calcium Regulation of Specific Promoter Motifs in Arabidopsis

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 4079-4095

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.090480

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. BBSRC [BB/G025029/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G025029/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increases in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+] c) mediate plant responses to stress by regulating the expression of genes encoding proteins that confer tolerance. Several plant stress genes have previously been shown to be calcium-regulated, and in one case, a specific promoter motif Abscisic Acid Responsive-Element (ABRE) has been found to be regulated by calcium. A comprehensive survey of the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome for calcium-regulated promoter motifs was performed by measuring the expression of genes in Arabidopsis seedlings responding to three calcium elevations of different characteristics, using full genome microarray analysis. This work revealed a total of 269 genes upregulated by [Ca2+](c) in Arabidopsis. Bioinformatic analysis strongly indicated that at least four promoter motifs were [Ca2+](c)-regulated in planta. We confirmed this finding by expressing in plants chimeric gene constructs controlled exclusively by these cis-elements and by testing the necessity and sufficiency of calcium for their expression. Our data reveal that the C-Repeat/Drought-Responsive Element, Site II, and CAM box (along with the previously identified ABRE) promoter motifs are calcium-regulated. The identification of these promoter elements targeted by the second messenger intracellular calcium has implications for plant signaling in response to a variety of stimuli, including cold, drought, and biotic stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available