4.8 Article

Global Epigenetic and Transcriptional Trends among Two Rice Subspecies and Their Reciprocal Hybrids

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 17-33

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.072041

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM047850]
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI0922604, MCB-0929100]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009DFB30030]
  4. Ministry of Agriculture of China [2009ZX08012-021B]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  6. Beijing Commission of Science and Technology
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM047850, R29GM047850, R37GM047850] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The behavior of transcriptomes and epigenomes in hybrids of heterotic parents is of fundamental interest. Here, we report highly integrated maps of the epigenome, mRNA, and small RNA transcriptomes of two rice ( Oryza sativa) subspecies and their reciprocal hybrids. We found that gene activity was correlated with DNA methylation and both active and repressive histone modifications in transcribed regions. Differential epigenetic modifications correlated with changes in transcript levels among hybrids and parental lines. Distinct patterns in gene expression and epigenetic modifications in reciprocal hybrids were observed. Through analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms from our sequence data, we observed a high correlation of allelic bias of epigenetic modifications or gene expression in reciprocal hybrids with their differences in the parental lines. The abundance of distinct small RNA size classes differed between the parents, and more small RNAs were downregulated than upregulated in the reciprocal hybrids. Together, our data reveal a comprehensive overview of transcriptional and epigenetic trends in heterotic rice crosses and provide a useful resource for the rice community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available