4.6 Article

Effects of turbine spacing on the power output of extended wind-farms

Journal

WIND ENERGY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 359-370

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/we.1835

Keywords

wind-farm; turbine spacing; large eddy simulations; vertical kinetic energy flux; power production

Funding

  1. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM) - Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. National Science Foundation [1243482, OCI-1053575]
  3. Cartesius and LISA cluster of SURFsara in the Netherlands
  4. Office Of The Director
  5. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [1243482] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results from large eddy simulations of extended wind-farms for several turbine configurations with a range of different spanwise and streamwise spacing combinations. The results show that for wind-farms arranged in a staggered configuration with spanwise spacings in the range approximate to[3.5, 8] D, where D is the turbine diameter, the power output in the fully developed regime depends primarily on the geometric mean of the spanwise and streamwise turbine spacings. In contrast, for the aligned configuration the power output in the fully developed regime strongly depends on the streamwise turbine spacing and shows weak dependence on the spanwise spacing. Of interest to the rate of wake recovery, we find that the power output is well correlated with the vertical kinetic energy flux, which is a measure of how much kinetic energy is transferred into the wind-turbine region by the mean flow. A comparison between the aligned and staggered configurations reveals that the vertical kinetic energy flux is more localized along turbine columns for aligned wind-farms than for staggered ones. This additional mixing leads to a relatively fast wake recovery for aligned wind-farms. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available