4.7 Article

Overexpression of plastidial thioredoxin f leads to enhanced starch accumulation in tobacco leaves

Journal

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 618-627

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12052

Keywords

chloroplast transformation; tobacco; thioredoxin; starch; bioethanol feedstock

Funding

  1. Gobierno de Navarra [IIM10865.RI1]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [AGL2010-15107]
  3. CSIC
  4. G. Valenciana (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starch, the most abundant storage carbohydrate in plants, has been a major feedstock for first-generation biofuels. Growing fuel demands require, however, that the starch yields of energy crops be improved. Leaf starch is synthesised during the day and degraded at night to power nonphotosynthetic metabolism. Redox regulation has been associated with the coordination of the enzymes involved in starch metabolism, but neither the signals nor mechanisms that regulate this metabolism are entirely clear. In this work, the thioredoxin (Trx) f and m genes, which code for key enzymes in plastid redox regulation, were overexpressed from the plastid genome. Tobacco plants overexpressing Trx f, but not Trx m, showed an increase of up to 700% in leaf starch accumulation, accompanied by an increase in leaf sugars, specific leaf weight (SLW), and leaf biomass yield. To test the potential of these plants as a nonfood energy crop, tobacco leaves overexpressing Trx f were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis, and around a 500% increase in the release of fermentable sugars was recorded. The results show that Trx f is a more effective regulator of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in planta than Trx m. The overexpression of Trx f might therefore provide a means of increasing the carbohydrate content of plants destined for use in biofuel production. It might also provide a means of improving the nutritional properties of staple food crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available