4.7 Article

Sequencing and assembly of low copy and genic regions of isolated Triticum aestivum chromosome arm 7DS

Journal

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 768-775

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00587.x

Keywords

wheat genome sequence; chromosome 7; genome assembly; gene annotation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0882095, LP0883462, DP0985953]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [521/07/1573]
  3. European Union (Centre of the Region Hana for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research) [ED0007/01/01]
  4. Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF)
  5. Queensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundation (QCIF)
  6. Australian Partnership for Advanced Computing (APAC)
  7. Queensland Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics (QFAB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genome of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) is predicted to be greater than 16 Gbp in size and consist predominantly of repetitive elements, making the sequencing and assembly of this genome a major challenge. We have reduced genome sequence complexity by isolating chromosome arm 7DS and applied second-generation technology and appropriate algorithmic analysis to sequence and assemble low copy and genic regions of this chromosome arm. The assembly represents approximately 40% of the chromosome arm and all known 7DS genes. Comparison of the 7DS assembly with the sequenced genomes of rice (Oryza sativa) and Brachypodium distachyon identified large regions of conservation. The syntenic relationship between wheat, B. distachyon and O. sativa, along with available genetic mapping data, has been used to produce an annotated draft 7DS syntenic build, which is publicly available at http://www.wheatgenome.info. Our results suggest that the sequencing of isolated chromosome arms can provide valuable information of the gene content of wheat and is a step towards whole-genome sequencing and variation discovery in this important crop.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available