4.2 Article

FioreDB: a database of phenotypic information induced by the chimeric repressor silencing technology (CRES-T) in Arabidopsis and floricultural plants

Journal

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 37-43

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC PLANT CELL & MOLECULAR BIOL
DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.25.37

Keywords

Arabidopsis; chimeric repressor; CRES-T; database; floricultural plant

Funding

  1. Research Council, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan [1782]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manipulation of horticultural plants' traits using genetic engineering has been a challenge because of gene redundancy and limited information concerning genome or other factors necessary for successful engineering. Recently we have developed a powerful tool with potential to overcome these difficulties, a novel gene silencing technology targeting transcription factor, which is designated Chimeric REpressor gene-Silencing Technology (CRES-T). Using this system, we are now analyzing biological functions of transcription factors in Arabidopsis and trying to manipulate morphological traits of various floricultural plants. To provide these information for genetic engineering of horticultural plants, we have developed the 'FioreDB' database in a web-based interface (http://www.cres-t.org/fiore/public_db/), which stores phenotypic information induced by various chimeric repressors in Arabidopsis and six floricultural plants, namely torenia, chrysanthemum, gentian, cyclamen, eustoma, morning glory. Users can find gene constructs that induce their preferred phenotype in Arabidopsis using simple searches, and can browse induced phenotypes in floricultural plants. Most phenotypic information has photo data. FioreDB is continually updated by addition of new data derived from the CRES-T analyses. FioreDB will help to improve traits of horticultural plants using the CRES-T system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available