4.1 Article

The effects of city-suburb-exurb landscape context and distance to the edge on plant diversity of forests in Wuhan, China

Journal

PLANT BIOSYSTEMS
Volume 149, Issue 5, Pages 903-913

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2014.906510

Keywords

Edge effects; fragmentation; indigenous species; species richness; urbanization

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270465, 31000194, 31100508]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011PY098, 2011PY146]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analysed the relative role of landscape context (city, suburb and exurb) and distance to the edge (from forest edge to 45m in interior) on plant diversity of natural forests in Wuhan city. The results indicated that landscape context had significant effects on plant diversity, and both landscape context and distance to the edge affect vegetation and disturbance characteristics. Landscape context was the main factor affecting richness of woods, herbs, indigenous species, forest generalists and insect or wind pollination species. These species tended to be higher in exurban forests while non-indigenous species were higher in the urban forests. The number of non-indigenous species, forest specialists, herbs and insect pollination species also depended on distance to the edge or on both interactions. Richness of non-indigenous species decreased with increasing distance to the edge in urban forest. Vegetation characteristics that shrub cover was lower and disturbance characteristics that disturbed cover and human activity were higher in the urban edge than in the suburb and exurb edge, which decreased from the edge to the interior. Therefore, we should prioritize the preservation of less disturbed and frequented forests (suburban and exurban) to buffer the invasion of non-indigenous species, and to reserve more indigenous species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available