4.1 Article

Nuclear DNA C-values for biodiversity screening: Case of the Lebanese flora

Journal

PLANT BIOSYSTEMS
Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages 1228-1237

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2013.861530

Keywords

Chromosome number; endemism; genome size; Lebanon; nuclear DNA C-value; plant diversity; polyploidy

Categories

Funding

  1. AUF reseau BIOVEG [P2.2092RR707]
  2. UNESCO-L'Oreal for Women in Science Fellowship
  3. UNESCO-HP Brain Gain Initiative
  4. National Council for Scientific Research Lebanon
  5. Conseil General de l'Essonne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The geographic position of Lebanon in the Mediterranean basin at the transition of two major landmasses, Eurasia and Africa, has contributed to its high plant diversity and makes its flora particularly interesting to study. This paper contributes to the plant DNA C-value database of native Lebanese taxa. These data should reinforce biodiversity evaluation, systematic and evolution studies involving processes of speciation such as polyploidisation. C-values have been estimated by flow cytometry using propidium iodide as intercalary fluorochrome stain. Each sample comprised at least five individuals. Where possible, several populations were measured for each species. This study presents C-values for 225 taxa belonging to 55 families and 141 genera. C-values are novel for 193 taxa including 126 plants endemic to the Eastern Mediterranean region. These are the first values for 50 genera. In this panel, genome size ranged from 1C=0.28pg in Hypericum thymifolium to 54.69pg in Fritillaria alfredae. The life growth form and life cycle type are analysed according to the genome size class. Cases of polyploidy are reported for some species usually considered as only diploid. Examination of C-value variation through flow cytometry constitutes a powerful tool to screen taxonomic heterogeneity, opening further investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available