4.1 Article

Fine resolution distribution modelling of endemics in Majella National Park, Central Italy

Journal

PLANT BIOSYSTEMS
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 276-287

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2012.685194

Keywords

Apennines; arctic-alpine; biodiversity; distribution modelling; herbarium records; hotspot; maximum entropy

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for International Cooperation in Higher Education (NUFFIC)
  2. European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action: Expected Climate Change and Options for European Silva-culture (ECHOES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Majella National Park in central Italy is known to be an endemic-rich area, but distributions of its endemics have not been comprehensively studied. Endemics with 10 or more records and spatial uncertainties at <5 km were extracted from the Central-Apennine floristic geodatabase and the MNP Seed Index. Nine environmental predictor layers were prepared at 90 and 30 m resolution. A stepwise Maximum Entropy (Maxent) model was generated per endemic to achieve the most parsimonious result at an area under the curve > 0.8. Arctic-alpine elevation, edaphic barrens and low open-vegetation, individually or in pairs, were found to be predictive for endemics. Forty-eight endemics, 10 of which exclusive, were recorded and Maxent-predicted for the Majella massif. Subsets of 38 endemics were recorded on other mountains in proportion to their arctic-alpine area, thus conforming to the Island Theory. Maxent confirmed its strengths also at fine resolutions and, in addition, showed to be robust across predictor layers at both resolutions. A linear species-area relationship appeared superior to the Maxent model in predicting the number of endemics per arctic-alpine island. Our findings suggest the need for a proactive management of the botanical biodiversity contained in the alpine and montane barrens and low-open vegetation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available